Twice Exceptional

Twice-exceptional (2e) students—those who are both intellectually gifted and have ADHD—are often misunderstood in ways that quietly shape their emotional lives. From the outside, they may appear capable, bright, even thriving. Internally, many are struggling with self-doubt, social isolation, and emotional overload that is easy to miss precisely because of their ability.

Recent research paints a consistent and sobering picture: giftedness does not protect students with ADHD from social-emotional difficulties. In many cases, it may intensify them.

This blog brings together findings from multiple studies to clarify what we know about the risk factors, the surprising lack of protective factors, and what this means for parents, educators, and clinicians who want to support 2e students more effectively.

What Does “Twice-Exceptional” Really Mean?

Twice-exceptionality refers to individuals who demonstrate high intellectual ability while also meeting criteria for a disability such as ADHD. This dual profile often creates masking in both directions:

  • Strengths can hide disabilities

  • Disabilities can obscure strengths

From a cognitive and psychological perspective, 2e students frequently show:

  • Advanced reasoning and problem-solving

  • High creativity and divergent thinking

  • Intense curiosity and energy

At the same time, they may struggle with:

  • Sustained attention and planning

  • Processing speed and prioritization

  • Emotional regulation

  • Peer relationships and social interpretation

This uneven profile makes linear learning paths—and linear expectations—particularly challenging.

Socio-Emotional Risk Factors: What the Research Consistently Shows

Across ten empirical studies examining gifted students with ADHD, every study identified socio-emotional risk factors associated with this dual diagnosis.

Peer Relationships Are a Central Vulnerability

One of the most consistent findings is that 2e students with ADHD experience more difficulty forming and maintaining friendships than:

  • gifted peers without ADHD

  • students with ADHD who are not gifted

  • students without either trait

Studies report lower levels of companionship, fewer close friendships, and greater feelings of social disconnection. Importantly, giftedness does not improve friendship quality for students with ADHD.

Social difficulties are often linked to:

  • misreading social cues

  • social immaturity relative to cognitive ability

  • boredom and disengagement with peers

  • frustration when expectations are misunderstood

These challenges frequently lead to withdrawal, loneliness, and emotional distress.

Self-Esteem and Self-Concept Are Consistently Lower

Several studies found that gifted students with ADHD score significantly lower on:

  • self-esteem

  • behavioural self-concept

  • overall happiness

Despite having similar IQs to gifted peers without ADHD, students with the dual profile report feeling worse about themselves and their behaviour. This pattern persists across childhood and adolescence, with adolescents showing greater vulnerability than younger children.

This matters because self-concept mediates motivation, resilience, and long-term mental health.

Emotional Regulation Is a Major Strain

Difficulties with emotional regulation appear across genders, though they may present differently:

  • Gifted boys with ADHD often show heightened frustration, emotional intensity, and family stress. Some studies suggest giftedness may actually exacerbate emotional difficulties in boys.

  • Gifted girls with ADHD more often report social isolation, feeling misunderstood, lowered confidence, and internalized distress.

In one retrospective study, prolonged social isolation and emotional distress in a gifted male participant with ADHD contributed to suicide, underscoring the seriousness of these risks when unmet over time.

Giftedness Is Not a Protective Factor

One of the most striking conclusions across the literature is this:

Giftedness does not buffer against the socio-emotional risks associated with ADHD.

In some cases, it appears to make things harder.

Advanced cognitive abilities can increase awareness of difference, intensify perfectionism, and raise expectations from adults and peers—without providing additional emotional scaffolding. Asynchronous development (advanced thinking paired with delayed regulation or social skills) leaves many 2e students feeling “out of sync” with their environment.

Protective Factors: A Notable Gap

Among all ten studies reviewed, only one identified clear protective factors for gifted students with ADHD.

That study found that:

  • supportive teachers

  • positive peer relationships

significantly strengthened motivation and emotional well-being.

No other studies identified protective factors, despite examining multiple domains of functioning.

This absence highlights a major gap in the research: twice-exceptional students are rarely studied from a strength-based perspective, even though strengths clearly exist.

Diagnostic Complexity and Overlap

Adding to the challenge, ADHD is often over- or mis-identified in gifted populations due to symptom overlap. Behaviours such as:

  • boredom

  • overexcitability

  • intense focus on preferred topics

  • rapid responding

can resemble ADHD symptoms but may stem from giftedness, asynchronous development, or lack of appropriate challenge.

At the same time, when ADHD is present, it carries real functional risks:

  • increased grade repetition

  • lower academic achievement

  • higher rates of comorbid mental health concerns

  • greater overall impairment

Accurate, nuanced assessment is essential.

What This Means in Practice

Taken together, the research suggests that gifted students with ADHD require holistic, theory-driven, and individualized support that addresses:

  • emotional regulation

  • peer relationships

  • self-concept

  • identity development

Academic accommodation alone is not enough.

Equally important is moving beyond deficit-only models. A student can be struggling and capable. Both realities must be held at once.

Where We Need to Go Next

Future research—and practice—needs to:

  • clarify diagnostic frameworks for 2e students

  • examine long-term developmental trajectories

  • explore culturally diverse experiences

  • identify and strengthen protective factors

Most importantly, we need approaches that integrate strengths with support, rather than asking gifted students with ADHD to compensate endlessly for systems that do not fit them.

A Final Thought

Twice-exceptional students are not paradoxes to be solved.
They are complex systems to be understood.

When we recognize both their brilliance and their vulnerability, we move closer to environments where they can thrive—not by masking who they are, but by being supported as they are.

If you work with, parent, or are a gifted individual with ADHD, this understanding isn’t just academic—it’s foundational

Previous
Previous

ADHD and ASD

Next
Next

ADHD and Food